Introduction
If the economy is composed of the Treaty, there is little doubt that a system of free or on a market-based rather limited. The reason is quite simple to understand. Economics is a study siocological: to grasp and understand, the fluctuation and the mechanics of interaction between people of the same company. In an economic system that people buy wheret free or for sale are what they have, they want at any cost, there is a fervent interestsociologists to understand the rules of exchange – are those sociologists, economists are known. Any questions: Why is this person sell at that price? We need to understand the interests of parties other: Consumers, Employees, and competition rules, the economic strength of one or other party or a party to increase or decrease, causing the number of members.
The nature of man, as a group, a society is studied economics. In a communistEconomy, many of these questions in silence. Although it may be studied by sociologists to understand what kind of society would be almost completely ignored (and despised) by economists. Why is it so? Since the traditional elements, often in economic study, such as competition or rent trends or fluctuations, have disappeared. private interests may be, the whole economy is to adjust the basis of the capitalist economy. In a communist economy, prices, production,Distribution and consumption of goods is decided by the public interest. The primary element of the economic study, private interests will be eliminated, for the most part. But in a communist economy, the exchange between members of the riches to be discussed. E 'in this essay, I hope to expand the idea of a communist economy.
The paper: the question of distribution of work
Before continuing, in this essay, I think it is important to establish a communist systemexactly. From communist economy, I believe, a system of production and distribution, WHERE is paid each person according to the value of their work. All this is governed by the public, rather than governed by private interest – as is the case, when he was a capitalist economy. That said, I continue with this treaty economy of communism.
If something is produced and sold as a commodity, it could be sold in different forms. The particular form Ispeak, I mean the will of its use. Several hundred boards and one or two tons of cement are less willing to use as a home, frozen vegetables are less willing to a warm, cooked meals are eaten. So we have a variety of forms of will to consume, if an item is sold. The production, if a product is distributed as a person cooking your food to be, this production, I decided, "family name".
The importance ofComparing this type of work can be viewed in a communist economy. Since it is the collective, which sets to build the type of industry, They must decide whether to sell the house, or simply the material to build a house – if you sell clothing or fabric. In assessing the effectiveness of the industrial labor versus domestic labor market, there is no doubt that the industrial work tends to be much more productive. However, to produce something different materials – while the exchange value less -More information may be required. For example, a great food product probably already cooked food at the beginning of a journey or a trip for the days you want. Even a person may like to build their homes or to find cooking their own food. Sometimes these things are a chore, some are really a joy, happiness, or routine for others.
The increased availability of goods, industrial work more on everything to do. Letshows an example. In a region where there are 2,000 members of the workforce, half work in agriculture and the other half in production. Employee works an hour and a half hours a day, but no product is sold ready – requires it to consume the domestic labor market to make all consummable ("consume" Well, I mean) to use. The frozen food is offered, fabric and sewing kits are sold, and perhaps to prevent the sale of a product unprepared, not everyone is able to prepare,The apartments are rented. In agriculture, there are four areas: two of wheat, the production of vegetables, fruit and producers. Each sector has 250 employees. The processing industry is divided into four areas: an area of converting food (eg wheat) in a form consummable, a field of extraction and refining of metals, and two sectors producing a wide variety of products such as bicycles , toys, road signs and other products. Each sector has 250Workers. In both industries, sectors, each worker works 1.5 hours.
Each farm worker position for three meals per hour and a half of work, for a total of nine meals a day for their work. This means that meals are 4.5 and 4.5 meals each country, workers have every type of production workers (from 1,000 employees who work 1.5 hours per day up to nine meals per day ie to produce 9,000 meals per day for 2,000 employees). And althoughAgriculture usually collects fruit, is not every day, But in one year, I am simplifying in view of this fact to my scenario.
Each industrial worker is able couple three dresses, three moderately valuable objects of enjoyment (as a toy or electronic device), or 3 pieces of furniture every half-hour of work. Since every business and industrial works and a half hours, will produce approximately: 9 pairs in a clothing worker per day, 9 toys per employee per day and 9Furniture worker per day. Again, I can give these seem to be oversimplified, but if this is the impression that the reader has to Understand, it's only because I do not want to draw too complicated scenario. Thus, by 1000 industrial workers every day is produced, 3,000 pairs of clothing, 3,000 objects of pleasure, and 3,000 pieces furnuter. 1500, each element of the industrial workers distributed and distributed anywhere on the farm 1500Workers.
So we have a vision of an economy in which everyone is satisfied. Although each person indsutry of 1 and a half of work every day, every person has met their needs. But to show that economic fluctuations in the economy communist half, we throw some variables in this scenario I described above.
that a new requirement is usually communist economy of this hypothetical desired location. Suppose that each person who earns an interest in music, verystrong interest. Suppose a factory has been selected from this population for the production of music CDs. Regardless of the production and the desire to consume whatever is, let's say 500 people – musicians, producers, production, etc. necessary. Agriculture loses 250 employees and, therefore, the processing industry. What is the bottom line? Well, in every manufacturing industry and agriculture have yet to produce the same amount with fewer workers. With 1,000Each employee working 1.5 hours or 1,500 working hours a day, every industry should be able to meet the needs of society. Each sector now has 750 employees, and if they worked 1.5 hours a day, then have only 1,125 hours of work per day, not the needs of the population of 375 hours per day. Everyone should work two hours a day, half an hour extra. Of course they are trading at this hour for more than half of luxury, especially since the other 500 employees areYour music products. Here we can see the obvious fluctuations in the economy in a communist society. Maybe next year, the technology is a leap, and each employee must work only one hour. Or perhaps a natural disaster and Stirka for two months, they have to work three hours a day to rebuild. Perhaps the interest of society in a good or service will increase or decrease.
I have exactly the ratio of industrial labor for other industrial work described. ButAs the title of this paper means that we understand, industrial work / chores. required to satisfy food needs of an industrial worker – with the help of technology and specialization – two minutes from work to be commis food. In a house, a meal would require fair compensation from 15 to 20 minutes, maybe longer, preparation, namely the use of local labor market. The question of how exactly this hypothetical comparison should not need much tobe addressed. It 'clear that the vast majority of industrial labor is more productive than domestic labor. A man who perhaps make cooking position, 20 or 30 meals a day, every hour if they work. But few people with the help of technology and specialization can hundreds or thousands in one day – make this case with fast food restaurants. So if this company, which means 2,000 people will need three meals a day, in the form of housework, this, 1 hourpersonal work day. However, if every meal is produced in the industrial work, means that six minutes of work per day per person. Overall, this is 2,000 hours (120.00 minutes) of the domestic labor market for 2,000. But when the industrial labor was used, it would be a total of 200 hours (12,000 minutes) of the industrial work of 2,000 people. However, if the people decided to prepare all the food through industrial work and saves a lot of work and increasesThe performance of ten times, then every person labor market more industrial. A small group of people working for preparing this food is that MEANS and others in the other sectors Have to work longer, as I demonstrated in the section where a music industry came up in this society. A person, the global labor (households, businesses) could five hours a day preparing meals, but if a person eats prepared industrially work was perhaps only a total of four hours a day – sosaves time and increases productivity.
The next question is whether ARRIS, the company wants only to industrial work and do housework. For some people, the normal exercise routine day to day life and operations desirable. Marx once said, …
product "What is the employee] [for wages, and silk, gold, and the palace for him are resolved in a certain amount of necessities of life, perhaps in a denim jacket in copper coins, and aBASEMENT. And the worker who weaves for 12 hours, turns, drills, turns, builds, shovels, rocks, bears drinking, and so on - 12 hours weaving, spinning, drilling, turning, building, shovels, stone is broken, considered by him as a manifestation of life, life? Quite the contrary. For him life begins where that activity is not at the table in the pub, in bed. The 12 hours of work, on the other hand, has no meaning for him, such as weaving, spinning, boring, and so on,but only as a result, sit at a table to take his place in the tavern, and set to allow in a bed. If the silkworm is the object were spinning Caterpillar prolong his existence would have been a perfect example of working for a wage. "[" Wage Labour and Capital by Karl Marx, in December 1847, edited by Friedrich Engels, Chapter 3: "What are wages? How are?]
The day did not start the job when he wakes up, but it begins as soon as his industrial workends. These acts of housework, cooking, cleaning and housekeeping, car, or belong to elements of their lives. work, maybe six minutes less desirable than an industrial are hours of housework, because industrial labor is merely a nuisance (for most), and is home of the day to day. Of course, the opposite must be true. A person may know that domestic work is unproductive, and we believe that only through industrial work, it should function as a sort of workPride ethics. But then again, all workers must recognize that every moment does not work, both industrial and household, for a moment to relax, have fun, to pursue some hobbies or leisure activities – something for yourself or a. It 's a challenge that we are recognized. Communism must be a reference to the fact that every person is different, practiced lifestyles and interests. To force people, in a way that does not liverecognize how different it is unjust and without appeal to reason or justice. A quote from Karl Marx again …
want "In a higher phase of communist society, after slavery, the subordination of the individual to the division of labor and hence the opposition between intellectual and physical labor has vanished, and after the work is not just a way of life, but life first, after the productive forces have increased with the all-round development of the individual, andall sources of wealth flow more abundantly co-op – only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be crossed in its entirety and write the company on its banners: From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs! "(Emphasis added.) [Critique of the Gotha Programme by Karl Marx, 1875, Part 1].
be placed on how to get my last scene, with the communist economy. In this economy than 2,000 workers, the fact must be achieved and previousIt is understood that: Every person is different, with different needs. A person can very Thoreau-like in their needs: they only wneed food and not a luxury item. As a natural world can explore and enjoy all the emotions like all they need to live their lives happily. Some people need a little 'lxury from industrial work, and can be easily fulfilled by it. Others need a moderate amount, while others still want large quantities, and finally, some classesLuxury feel content and happy in their lives. Everyone is different in their needs. Now, assuming that the extreme demand for luxury, the lowest of the people and the moderate level of need is included for luxury, where most people can be found. With all this together, it seems the economy in this communist society?
With 2,000 people, say 100 of them, not a luxury, lust and desire of wealth 100 rebates – which explains the two ends of the spectrum. Thenfor those who have only a small amount of luxury, there are 400, and those that require large amounts to 400. Then finally, there are 1000, the only moderate amounts similar.
Those who want nothing more than an hour for maintenance work on the readership of a small luxury 2 hours, moderate luxury three hours, four hours of high-luxury, high luxury five hours, a total of 5,000 industrial workers hours a day, This varies from 2,000 workers. Now consider the output of each class of workers.Those who want nothing more than the mere maintenance of life, working 1 hour a day. Whether in agriculture, six meals a day. That is, eat three meals, and the other 3 meals are for such needs as clothing or housing are exchanged (money of course – as much as it is hated by labor groups – will allow for easy replacement). If this bare subsistence employees worked in production for 1 hour per day that the production of six products, three of which remain and the other three were exchangedfor food. The three, who should be held, probably needs such as clothing and housing. Those who work at least two hours a day of luxury. Whether in agriculture, which means 12 meals per day. That means you eat 3-6 meals, and the rest are traded for necessities and luxuries. The translation would mean production of requirements 6-9, 3, 3-6 with the other elements of luxury. When in production, two hours a day of work products would result in 12.Some are preserved, others are mistaken for food and other necessities. Those who moderate wealth, the largest class want to work three hours a day. In the agricultural sector, resulting in 18 meals, most of it probably exchanged for luxury items. In the production is that products implemented at 18, some of them exchanged for food. Who will be the desire of wealth a lot of work four hours a day. In agriculture, the 24 meals, which means that most of them exchanged. In manufacturing, 24 products, some ofthey are exchanged. And finally those who want to work large estates of rich 5 hours per day. In agriculture produces 30 food or in production, manufacturing 30 products, each of which can be exchanged.
The ethical principles of a communist society would be this: You are in proportion to the work that you will be rewarded. Those who receive little 'work, pay a bit', like those who get to do a lot of work to pay much. The premises, which I use are based on justice andFairness. With this complete document, I hope to have a good theoretical consideration of the communist economy: it has offered its fluctuations, its dynamics and its very simple mechanism.
www.punkerslut.com
For Life
Cheap Breast Pumps